Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emma Lene vs Imogen Haddad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lene vs Haddad analysis and find out who is favored!
Emma Lene vs Imogen Haddad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lene 1 - 0 Haddad
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lene has won 44.53% of points on their second serve, while Haddad has won 43.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lene, in recent form, has won 53.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Haddad has won 63.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.59% and 42.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lene has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haddad has saved 46.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lene has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 30/ 25), with Haddad winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lene has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 47/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 114/ 104). Haddad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Lene has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.72% of matches (W/L 29/ 24), where as Haddad has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 10/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lene winning 1 times and Haddad being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lene winning 2 and Haddad winning 1. The last match between Lene and Haddad was at the W100 Shrewsbury, 15-10-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Emma Lene getting the victory 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lene and Haddad have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lene winning 1 times and Haddad 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lene winning 1, and Haddad 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lene has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.8 while Haddad has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lene has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haddad has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lene has converted 54.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haddad has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
470
Rank
384
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
53% (175-153)
Career Total W/L
46% (11-13)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emma Lene vs Imogen Haddad For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lene VS Haddad
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Emma Lene | Imogen Haddad |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:8:0 | 3:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (77/101) | 70% (109/156) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (49/77) | 58% (63/109) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 45% (21/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 19% (5/27) | 25% (4/16) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (72/156) | 39% (39/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Emma Lene
Player
Imogen Haddad
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
109 of
156)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
63 of
109)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
19%
(
5 of
27)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
72 of
156)
134
Total Points Won
123
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emma Lene | Imogen Haddad |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (39/28) | 54% (7/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (342/270) | 53% (63/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 54 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 128 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:28 | 1:20:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.39 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1381/2012) | 57% (157/275) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (882/1381) | 62% (97/157) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (281/631) | 43% (51/118) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (131/242) | 50% (22/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (880/1905) | 52% (165/318) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (17/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Emma Lene Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Jessica Pieri
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Alina Charaeva
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Emma Lene
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Victoria Kapcia
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Emma Lene
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Unknown Player
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Emma Lene
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
45 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Emma Lene
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Angelica Moratelli
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emma Lene
86%
(
74 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Imogen Haddad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Imogen Haddad
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Imogen Haddad
Player
Lina Soussi
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleanor Dean
Player
Imogen Haddad
67%
(
78 of
117)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
110)
4
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
6
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
54 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Imogen Haddad
Player
Francesca Franchi
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Kozakova
Player
Imogen Haddad
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Imogen Haddad
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Imogen Haddad
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
109 of
156)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
63 of
109)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
19%
(
5 of
27)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
72 of
156)
134
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lene Vs Haddad Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lene are available here and Haddad photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emma Lene
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
